home : wine recommendations : wine girl for hire : bio : articles : contact

Montgueux: Disrespecting the Chalk
September 30, 2007

Montgueux, about 100 km's south of Epernay, not far from the Burgundy border, is a region of the Aube that has more in common with the mid-west than what we think of Champagne. Mile follows mile of eye numbing non-viticulture agriculture. The treat after the crepe-like flatness is the charming medieval town of Troyes which springs forth from the wheat and Bricomats. And, of in the distance is the hill.

It is a BIG hill. There are vines on the south eastern slope. This miracle is the hill of Montgueux.

Who knew?

Though the people up north barely consider the Cote de Bar a contender for terroir, this remarkable carbuncle-like hill has a different reputation. The late Daniel Thibaut who had been the winemaker at Charles Heidsieck described Montgueux, with 446 acres of vines planted to 85% Chardonnay, as the”Montrachet of Champagne.” The reason, is that this hill is one big pile of chalk.

As usual, the weather in Champagne was a stormy, freezing mess. My cute red Citroen climbed the hill trying to see how there were 446 acres planted. It seemed half as much.

I arrived at the top and saw that most of the town was made up of the Lassaigne clan. The Lassaigne I was looking for was right near the cemetery. I was grateful for the clue because this was the first day in three that I didn’t get lost.

I made the turn at the headstones and stepped on the brakes. I had to because splayed out before me were text book illustrations of three different kinds of farming. Perfect.

Even though my shoes were not mud worthy, I got out to walk the vines. The first one was a version of lutte raisonée which means 'rational farming.' It seems as if you can rationally spray as many chemicals and synthetic fertilizers as you want and say proudly you use lutte raisonée. Funny to think that these people often think biodynamic is a marketing tool as these lutte folk often say they are almost organic.

Mr. Rational's vineyard was bordered by a few red pumpkins. This farmer had some patches of green in his vines. He hadn't killed off everything. Right past the pumpkins was classic ‘traditional’ farming. This was scorched earth tortured by chemicals. The scorching was in a straight line through the vines up to the grass. Not only was the grass dead as well as the soil, but the vines were practically totally defoliated. The two flanking vineyards were a little damaged on the edges because of the proximity to the major offender. I was told later that Nicolas Feuillate buys all of this farmers grapes.

PICT0065_13.JPG
(you might want to click on the picture for the full effect)

Wow! This was common place not too long ago. I didn’t know anyone had the nerve to farm this way anymore. What a throw back. It was so Chernobylized. There was nothing in that soil and most of the vines were defoliated.

The day before the CIVC proudly told me that they reduced chemicals in the region by 45%. Of course, when this was the norm, they were the worst offenders in France, they had the furtherst to go in reformation.

Now, look at the photo again, just past the disaster.... see the bright Ireland lush green? Emmanuel Lassaigne's.

A few minutes later I interrupted Emmanuel’s parents lunch in their enclosed patio and traipsed manure-like mud all over their white tile.



Comments

Hi Alice,

I’ve driven through this part of France, and I appreciate the beauty of the wheat fields since I grew up in Kansas. Besides, those crepe-like fields is where the flour comes from that goes into those wonderful baguettes!

I’m not sure the differences you saw between the “Chernobylized” vineyard and Lassaigne’s vineyard had anything to do with their chemical input programs. There might be other farming practices or site differences that caused one vineyard to be green and the other not. I’ve seen very beautiful and balanced vineyards clear out past harvest in mid-October that received extensive weed/mildew/rot synthetic-chemical programs (plus fertilizers). Don’t get me wrong, I am for minimal chemical usage, but I also know that there are a few vineyard chemicals and fertilizers available that when used judiciously have negligible environmental impact. One of the problems is when the consumer visits a vineyard/winery or sees photos, they expect to see pristinely weed-less rows, even though a few weeds have no impact on grape uniqueness or quality. When was the last time you saw a vineyard with weeds on the front cover of any magazine?

scott on October 3, 2007 08:17 PM

Hi Scott, I'm not just talking lack of green, it was about death. The grass leading up to the vines was brown as well. There was nothing alive in the vineyard and the vines were in serious defoliation.If you look at the photograph below this post you get another view of the devastation. Even in Champagne this kind of viticulture seems out of date. No?

Alice on October 3, 2007 08:31 PM

Alice,
In Andrew Jefford's "The New France" it claims that up until 1998 Paris's city rubbish ( think garbage to you linguistically different ) was grouind up and freely spread over even 100% Grand Cru sites. Called "gadoux", its remains can be seen clearly between tha vines - tres raisonee. Write on with such delightful iconoclasm - cheers Andrew

Andrew Martin on October 4, 2007 04:35 AM

Hey Andrew, And it still exists. Still shocking to see not only everywhere but also in Krug's Clos de Mesnil.Amongst the few vigneron who work their land, it is less visible and they've obviously made an effort to get them out. Love Jefford's book. A terrific writer. No?--Alice

Alice on October 4, 2007 01:26 PM

Agreed, the slash and burn approach to vineyard management is not needed and is outdated. My guess is, though, the defoliation you saw was due to either a mineral deficiency or disease.

By the way, does anyone know if the Parisian garbage used in the vineyards was limited to decent quality composting material?

scott on October 4, 2007 08:07 PM

To my knowledge, all garbage was accepted. We've seen all sorts of electrical crap in the vineyards. and of course the blue bags that never breakdown is indication to the careful thought they gave this.


About that land? The strip of devastation was clearly defined with healthy to healthier vineyards on either side. Doubt it was disease. And anyway, the chemical farming was confirmed (by Lassaigne.)--Alice

Alice on October 4, 2007 09:40 PM

Chem farming destroys the soil microbiology and thus reduces its capacity to release nutrients to the vines. That might explain the poor condition of those vines as compared to its neighbors.
Regarding the "compost" - garbage in, garbage out...

Hank on October 5, 2007 01:41 PM

Hi Alice
Would be very interested to have your views on the wines of Em.lassaigne and also david leclapart.
I am visiting the latter in January

rgds
peter Ballantyne

peter ballantyne on December 7, 2007 05:08 PM
Post a comment